We sent an email to: Please click on the link inside the email to complete your registrationThis service is temporary unavailable due to system maintenance. Please try again later.The username entered is already associated withanother account. Please enter a different usernameThe email address you have entered is already in use.Please re-enter the email address.After a few days of Pakistani newspapers blaming each other for being the origin of fake WikiLeak reports, many of which disparaged India, it’s still unclear who exactly is to blame for the fabricated stories published last week,toms outlet.The Online International News Network, a Pakistani news portal, said in a statement at the weekend that it fired online editor, Siddique Sajid, for fabricating a story based on purported U.S. diplomatic cables which showed India meddling in Pakistani affairs.“The Online management regrets the release of the said story by Online, its subsequent publication by media and the consequent erosion of their public credibility,” Online said in a statement.On Friday, Mr. Sajid had attempted to defend himself by saying he had simply lifted the “WikiLeaks” from The Daily Mail, another Pakistan newspaper.Adding to the confusion, The Daily Mail, a vehemently anti-Indian news Website, appeared to stand by its report in a confusing statement posted last week.“The Daily Mail takes immense pride and pleasure in leaking the actual American mindset about India,” said the paper in a statement it titled “Hats Off to the Nation.”The incident is likely to further deepen suspicion in India over the role of Pakistan’s media in pushing conspiracy theories about Related articles:
上一篇: chemise burberry la daubisation n est pas toujours contournable 下一篇: toms kids shoes 2010 Rohan wrote
发表评论 评论 (0 个评论)