s if anyone wants the view of Indian public they need to see twitter trends for India for past 5 days #Barkhagate tops it..Add to this the fact that a very small percentage of Indians are on Internet, fewer still use Twitter ..and very few really use it consistently and understand its intricacies 2:03 am November 23, 2010 Indian wrote: I don t doubt Burkha Dutt. But Vir Sanghvi s conversations with Radia gives a compelling picture of how he biased he is in his work. I remember seeing an interview of Sonia Gandhi interviewed by Vir Sanghvi. Now, it makes me realize that it was a well orchestrated one. Will never ever trust Vir Sanghvi again. Will never read his columns or watch his shows.But I choose to give the benefit of the doubt to Barkha Dutt because I haven t been able to point out any biased remarks of hers on-air. 2:35 am November 23, 2010 FooledByMedia wrote: http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/my-advice-vir-sanghvi-remains-sameWhy didn t the journos blow the whistle on corporate lobbyists working behind the scenes in cabinet formation ??? 2:46 am November 23, 2010 Yogye wrote: It is a clear case of an independent columnist running errands for a business house. He is clearly running errands for Congress in their negotiations with DMK. He is at the beck and call of the Lobbyist literally taking dictation for his articles. Listen to the familiarity of their interaction. Listen to when Ms Radia talks with Mr Tarun Das and confidently asserts that she can get Mr Sanghvi to ask some planted some planted questions in a proposed interview with Sunil Mittal..Ms Dutt comes across as an enthusiastic errand runner for the Congress party actively helping in ensuring that Mr Raja gets Telecommunications at the expense of Mr Maran.It is not only what they say but also the atmospherics that has convinced the general public that these guys are not what they present themselves to be 7:27 am November 23, 2010 Ketaki Pandya wrote: Vir sanghvi is a columnist. He writes about his opinions. He does not write news. So it does not matter who he talks to or what the hell he writes. If you don t like a columnist you just stop reading him or her. So even if he was wheeling-dealing, frankly, that s his business. There s isn t a whole lot you or i can do about that.If a news reporter messes around, now that s a very different ballgame. 1:22 pm November 23,
toms outlet, 2010 Dev wrote: Why Poke your nose into something that you are not meant to,
toms the shoes.Is their a journalism code of ethics? What does it say about this? As you all harp that just do your job and ask politicians to step down at the hint of impropriety, maybe you should lead by example and go of the air till this is sorted out 3:03 pm November 23,
cheapest toms shoes, 2010 ats wrote: BD or Singhvi s journos are lobbying today infact in some cases they are even blackmailing politicians, industralists and bureaucrats, for instance BD is most comfortable showcasing Sibal (Sibal himself is perhaps the most powerful lobbyist in the country today) and Vir s proximity to Sonia, Rahuls is well known. Only pe
Related articles:
上一篇： t shirt ralph lauren valeur si importante
下一篇： toms shoes sale a lawyer
发表评论 评论 (0 个评论)