Even if the five paragraph is translated directly from your article while no other content (which is not consistent with the facts),
air jordan, it was only about 50% of my article." Fang wrote. Fang microblogging own article of professor Robert appropriate rewriting. Professor,
louboutin pas cher, Robert said,
mercurial vapor, have been published in the magazine article,
air jordan pas cher, he can not be copied directly over 400 words, may not use the article in the chart. In addition, in the last open letter, Professor Roberts questioned Fang Cheating oversight China to become an unfettered or assume the role of the allegations. Fang respond Fang last night in microblogging, said professor Robert last year,
hollister online shop, the matter has been told his alma mater,
abercrombie, his alma mater,
abercrombie pas cher, that the lack of evidence,
abercrombie france, and has nothing to do with his studies, be dismissed, no longer care about the matter,
toms shoes. In the morning, the telephone interview Fang Fang said that the matter has been explained multiple times on the microblogging and blog without saying. He Professor (Robert) For the definition of plagiarism is not clear he thought to indicate the source,
louboutin, but did not get his license, or plagiarism. "Fang said professor Robert may be affected by domestic opposition to his" kidnapping ,
abercrombie. " "He do not understand the domestic situation,
ray ban lunettes, and I suspect him to get me a translation of the article is also against my people tampered with." Fang said,
mercurial. The news background, in May 1995, Fang wrote his "scientific" article published in the Internet. After it was found, strikingly similar point of view and the view of professor Robert Fang proposed in this paper,
hollister. 1600 words of the full text of about 900 words almost original quote from professor Robert "creationism is a scientific theory," but did not indicate the source.
Related articles:
上一篇： leaving about 7
下一篇： Camilla
发表评论 评论 (0 个评论)